🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.